Monokr0me
Administrator 
[F4:monokr0me]
Posts: 204
|
Post by Monokr0me on Jun 22, 2012 16:54:23 GMT -5
I've noticed that we still spend most of our time on the DBF chat, rather than our own IRC. this is 100% my fault for not promoting or embedding the IRC, however I was wondering if we even needed our own chat.
|
|
QwertyuiopThePie
Premiumfag 
Trying too hard since 1853 BC.
[F4:qwertyuiop95]
Posts: 224
|
Post by QwertyuiopThePie on Jun 22, 2012 16:58:50 GMT -5
I just don't think splitting the chat would be a good idea. As we're converting the DBF chat anyway, maybe we can make a joint chat? Like, you get access to the admin account and so do we? If it is split i do think the DBF chat should be embedded in some page or other.
|
|
nmagane
Banned
im gay %7C ur mom %7C 420.smoke.weed %7C ~Nigga 4 Lyfe~ %7C hi dad %7C metal sucks
I Am A Proud Neckbeard Come at Me Hater.[F4:tonsofdicks]
Posts: 459
|
Post by nmagane on Jun 22, 2012 17:16:03 GMT -5
i think that's a good idea, but what about the chat rules? you'll have to edit some of the DBF rules then.
|
|
|
|
Post by M4 on Jun 22, 2012 17:17:54 GMT -5
Embed the chat. Nobody wants to keep switching tabs just to see what is on qcode.
|
|
|
|
Post by Draxor on Jun 22, 2012 17:20:30 GMT -5
Maybe we can have both the DBF chat and our own chat...
|
|
QwertyuiopThePie
Premiumfag
Trying too hard since 1853 BC.
[F4:qwertyuiop95]
Posts: 224
|
Post by QwertyuiopThePie on Jun 22, 2012 17:24:32 GMT -5
Honestly I think the DBF rules could do with a bit of loosening, though I wouldn't admit it. Not so much lessening just... you know, more of a laid-back, Priok-y approach. Obviously if someone doesn't want another member to insult them a certain way that still applies here, and really that's the thing I care about.
|
|
|
|
Post by M4 on Jun 22, 2012 17:28:03 GMT -5
I think the DBF rules could do with a bit of loosening, though I wouldn't admit it. You just did. Do not worry though, I am just a function, I will not even hurt you.  |
|
|
|
Post by Draxor on Jun 22, 2012 17:34:19 GMT -5
QuartzCode's one and only rule:
Don't
Be
Faggot
|
|
QwertyuiopThePie
Premiumfag
Trying too hard since 1853 BC.
[F4:qwertyuiop95]
Posts: 224
|
Post by QwertyuiopThePie on Jun 22, 2012 18:00:52 GMT -5
No, actually it has four rules, but that summarizes them.
|
|
|
|
Post by D_M-01 on Jun 25, 2012 12:30:57 GMT -5
I like the way the current system is. I don't have to onto the forum anymore to check the chat.
The chat is the only primary reason I'm even active on the DBF.
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jul 7, 2012 17:05:23 GMT -5
I think we should get rid of the DBF chat. Time to start best new community.
|
|
nmagane
Banned
im gay %7C ur mom %7C 420.smoke.weed %7C ~Nigga 4 Lyfe~ %7C hi dad %7C metal sucks
I Am A Proud Neckbeard Come at Me Hater.[F4:tonsofdicks]
Posts: 459
|
Post by nmagane on Jul 7, 2012 17:17:46 GMT -5
time to win natural selection??? if we split the chat i bet we can effectively kill DBF and its chat. their forum is already almost dead anyway rofl
|
|
QwertyuiopThePie
Premiumfag
Trying too hard since 1853 BC.
[F4:qwertyuiop95]
Posts: 224
|
Post by QwertyuiopThePie on Jul 7, 2012 17:20:07 GMT -5
Not according to the "people here now" list, no. That one says the DBF is four times as active as Quartzcode.
|
|
|
|
Post by izacque on Jul 7, 2012 17:21:26 GMT -5
Yeah, so we should get rid of the DBF chat.
|
|
QwertyuiopThePie
Premiumfag
Trying too hard since 1853 BC.
[F4:qwertyuiop95]
Posts: 224
|
Post by QwertyuiopThePie on Jul 7, 2012 17:23:46 GMT -5
And what, split the communities? To what end? Believe it or not, most people on the DBF still enjoy talking to people on Qcode, and vice versa. If you want a chat you should at least let the chat have some level of activity, a level that would be nearly nonexistent if you split off the chat. DBF would be doing just fine, but people on a Qcode chat would be few and far between.
|
|
